https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225150 The court set aside the revisional order dated 30.05.2000 as it lacked reasoning, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons in judicial decisions for transparency and fairness. The second respondent was directed to reconsider the matter, issue a fresh reasoned order, and allow the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The judgment disposed of the petition with these directions and did not award any costs. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225150 The court set aside the revisional order dated 30.05.2000 as it lacked reasoning, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons in judicial decisions for transparency and fairness. The second respondent was directed to reconsider the matter, issue a fresh reasoned order, and allow the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The judgment disposed of the petition with these directions and did not award any costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225150