<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225143</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition concerning a dispute over the change of accounting method by a company. The court held that the petitioner should have utilized the available statutory remedies under the Income Tax Act, such as appeals and revisions, before approaching the court directly. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies in tax matters and directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal through the proper channels. The court also ordered the return of the original impugned order to enable the petitioner to file an appeal while excluding the period of pendency of the writ petition from the limitation period for filing an appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225143</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition concerning a dispute over the change of accounting method by a company. The court held that the petitioner should have utilized the available statutory remedies under the Income Tax Act, such as appeals and revisions, before approaching the court directly. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies in tax matters and directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal through the proper channels. The court also ordered the return of the original impugned order to enable the petitioner to file an appeal while excluding the period of pendency of the writ petition from the limitation period for filing an appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>