<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 371 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225142</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the levy of surcharge under Section 113 of the Income Tax Act and deleted the addition of undisclosed income for Assessment Years 1995-96 and 1996-97. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting legal requirements in tax assessments and ruled in favor of the revenue regarding the surcharge while upholding the deletion of the undisclosed income addition due to the respondent&#039;s failure to prove disclosure before the search commenced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 371 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225142</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the levy of surcharge under Section 113 of the Income Tax Act and deleted the addition of undisclosed income for Assessment Years 1995-96 and 1996-97. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting legal requirements in tax assessments and ruled in favor of the revenue regarding the surcharge while upholding the deletion of the undisclosed income addition due to the respondent&#039;s failure to prove disclosure before the search commenced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>