<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225140</link>
    <description>The Court found the assessee in default under Section 201(1) for failing to deduct tax at source but clarified that tax need not be recovered if already paid by the recipient. However, interest under Section 201(1A) was upheld until the recipient&#039;s actual payment date. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to determine the recipient&#039;s tax payments for accurate reassessment of the assessee&#039;s liability and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225140</link>
      <description>The Court found the assessee in default under Section 201(1) for failing to deduct tax at source but clarified that tax need not be recovered if already paid by the recipient. However, interest under Section 201(1A) was upheld until the recipient&#039;s actual payment date. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to determine the recipient&#039;s tax payments for accurate reassessment of the assessee&#039;s liability and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>