https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225132 A High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may correct an error apparent on the face of its own record by procedural review as a court of record. The absence of an express review provision in the Act does not bar correction of a procedural mistake where the earlier judgment went beyond the issues actually argued and caused prejudice. The Court therefore treated the review as maintainable, corrected the limitation finding so it applied only to the claims actually pressed, and left the remaining claims for further hearing. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225132 A High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may correct an error apparent on the face of its own record by procedural review as a court of record. The absence of an express review provision in the Act does not bar correction of a procedural mistake where the earlier judgment went beyond the issues actually argued and caused prejudice. The Court therefore treated the review as maintainable, corrected the limitation finding so it applied only to the claims actually pressed, and left the remaining claims for further hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225132