https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225132 The High Court reviewed its judgment dated 1st February 2013 and found an error in holding that claim nos. 1 and 2 were time-barred. The court determined that the State Government had not raised the issue of limitation for these claims, leading to a procedural error. Relying on its inherent powers, the High Court corrected the mistake through a procedural review, allowing the review petition and directing a hearing on claim nos. 1 and 2. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225132 The High Court reviewed its judgment dated 1st February 2013 and found an error in holding that claim nos. 1 and 2 were time-barred. The court determined that the State Government had not raised the issue of limitation for these claims, leading to a procedural error. Relying on its inherent powers, the High Court corrected the mistake through a procedural review, allowing the review petition and directing a hearing on claim nos. 1 and 2. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225132