https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225131 The Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It found that the dispute between the parties had been settled, as evidenced by the petitioner's letters expressing unconditional exit from the agreement and the respondent's actions in returning the bank guarantee and making partial payment. The Court emphasized that there were no live claims remaining between the parties, concluding that they had fulfilled their mutual rights and obligations, rendering the petitioner's claim moot. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:48:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225131 The Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It found that the dispute between the parties had been settled, as evidenced by the petitioner's letters expressing unconditional exit from the agreement and the respondent's actions in returning the bank guarantee and making partial payment. The Court emphasized that there were no live claims remaining between the parties, concluding that they had fulfilled their mutual rights and obligations, rendering the petitioner's claim moot. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225131