https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225131 Where correspondence shows an unconditional exit from the contract and settlement of mutual financial claims, no live dispute survives for arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Letters exchanged between the parties, together with acceptance and return of the bank guarantee, were treated as evidence that the contractual relationship had ended and that the claims stood satisfied. On that basis, the Court found the claim to be dead and refused appointment of an arbitrator because nothing remained for adjudication. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:48:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225131 Where correspondence shows an unconditional exit from the contract and settlement of mutual financial claims, no live dispute survives for arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Letters exchanged between the parties, together with acceptance and return of the bank guarantee, were treated as evidence that the contractual relationship had ended and that the claims stood satisfied. On that basis, the Court found the claim to be dead and refused appointment of an arbitrator because nothing remained for adjudication. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=225131