<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 353 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222157</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to settle the balance amount and furnish security within two weeks to halt further recovery proceedings. The court&#039;s decision aimed to address the default in compliance with the orders and provide an opportunity for the petitioner to resolve the outstanding issues related to the assessment orders and recovery proceedings effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 353 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222157</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to settle the balance amount and furnish security within two weeks to halt further recovery proceedings. The court&#039;s decision aimed to address the default in compliance with the orders and provide an opportunity for the petitioner to resolve the outstanding issues related to the assessment orders and recovery proceedings effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>