<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222153</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting a waiver of pre-deposit. The issue of service tax on the management, maintenance, or repair of roads for IPCL during 2005-06 and 2006-07 was found to be exempt under the retrospective amendment in the Finance Act, 2012, Section 97. This case underscores the impact of retrospective tax law amendments on ongoing legal matters, emphasizing the need for effective legal representation to leverage legislative changes in favor of taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222153</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting a waiver of pre-deposit. The issue of service tax on the management, maintenance, or repair of roads for IPCL during 2005-06 and 2006-07 was found to be exempt under the retrospective amendment in the Finance Act, 2012, Section 97. This case underscores the impact of retrospective tax law amendments on ongoing legal matters, emphasizing the need for effective legal representation to leverage legislative changes in favor of taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>