<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 348 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222152</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Novartis AG, holding that the beta crystalline form of Imatinib Mesylate did not qualify as an invention under the Patents Act, 1970, and failed the test of Section 3(d). The judgment emphasized the need to maintain a high standard for patentability to prevent the evergreening of patents and ensure access to affordable medicines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 348 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222152</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Novartis AG, holding that the beta crystalline form of Imatinib Mesylate did not qualify as an invention under the Patents Act, 1970, and failed the test of Section 3(d). The judgment emphasized the need to maintain a high standard for patentability to prevent the evergreening of patents and ensure access to affordable medicines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>