<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 340 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222144</link>
    <description>Section 50C is a deeming provision confined to transfers of land, building or both, and it cannot be extended by analogy to cover tenancy rights. Because tenancy rights are distinct from land or building, their transfer falls outside the statutory ambit of section 50C. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore fails on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:45:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 340 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222144</link>
      <description>Section 50C is a deeming provision confined to transfers of land, building or both, and it cannot be extended by analogy to cover tenancy rights. Because tenancy rights are distinct from land or building, their transfer falls outside the statutory ambit of section 50C. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore fails on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>