<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 333 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222137</link>
    <description>Receipt of a notice invoking arbitration starts arbitral proceedings under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so limitation stops on that receipt and a later Section 11(6) petition is not time-barred if the demand was made within three years of accrual. An objection based on alleged accord and satisfaction failed because the MOU was disputed and the parties&#039; correspondence showed an unconditional agreement to arbitrate; that correspondence also satisfied the requirements of an arbitration agreement under Section 7(4)(a). The court therefore rejected the objections and appointed a sole arbitrator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 333 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222137</link>
      <description>Receipt of a notice invoking arbitration starts arbitral proceedings under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so limitation stops on that receipt and a later Section 11(6) petition is not time-barred if the demand was made within three years of accrual. An objection based on alleged accord and satisfaction failed because the MOU was disputed and the parties&#039; correspondence showed an unconditional agreement to arbitrate; that correspondence also satisfied the requirements of an arbitration agreement under Section 7(4)(a). The court therefore rejected the objections and appointed a sole arbitrator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>