https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222136 A wide arbitration clause in a partnership deed was treated as continuing to subsist despite an earlier award and later memoranda, because the parties had continued under the same partnership arrangement and had previously invoked the same clause. Correspondence between them was also treated as evidence of an arbitration agreement under section 7(4)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. As the later disputes were distinct from the earlier reference, a successive reference was permitted and the objection to maintainability was rejected. An arbitrator was appointed under section 11(6) for adjudication of the disputes. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:13:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222136 A wide arbitration clause in a partnership deed was treated as continuing to subsist despite an earlier award and later memoranda, because the parties had continued under the same partnership arrangement and had previously invoked the same clause. Correspondence between them was also treated as evidence of an arbitration agreement under section 7(4)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. As the later disputes were distinct from the earlier reference, a successive reference was permitted and the objection to maintainability was rejected. An arbitrator was appointed under section 11(6) for adjudication of the disputes. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222136