https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222135 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand of Rs.1,06,651/- imposed on the appellant for a manufacturing discrepancy, citing insufficient evidence of clandestine activities and lack of concrete proof. Emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence in such cases, the Tribunal found the demand unjustified and highlighted the importance of independent evidence in tax disputes involving manufacturing differentials to prevent erroneous duty impositions. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:11:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222135 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand of Rs.1,06,651/- imposed on the appellant for a manufacturing discrepancy, citing insufficient evidence of clandestine activities and lack of concrete proof. Emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence in such cases, the Tribunal found the demand unjustified and highlighted the importance of independent evidence in tax disputes involving manufacturing differentials to prevent erroneous duty impositions. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222135