https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222131 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a refund of central excise duty, interest, and challenging unjust enrichment. The court found the petition misconceived, emphasizing that interest cannot be claimed without a written demand and that pursuing a writ petition alongside a statutory appeal on the same cause of action is impermissible. The court held that the petition lacked proper pleadings and foundation in the affidavit, rendering it infructuous after the statutory appeal decision. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222131 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a refund of central excise duty, interest, and challenging unjust enrichment. The court found the petition misconceived, emphasizing that interest cannot be claimed without a written demand and that pursuing a writ petition alongside a statutory appeal on the same cause of action is impermissible. The court held that the petition lacked proper pleadings and foundation in the affidavit, rendering it infructuous after the statutory appeal decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222131