https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222127 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the imposition of administrative charges on molasses under the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, along with potential taxation under the U.P. Trade Tax Act and VAT Act, to constitute double taxation. The court ordered the refund of unlawfully collected trade tax post a specific date and directed the State to cease levying trade tax on molasses purchases. The Supreme Court stayed the refund of taxes pending appeal, with the State liable to pay interest if the assessee succeeded in the appeal. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222127 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the imposition of administrative charges on molasses under the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, along with potential taxation under the U.P. Trade Tax Act and VAT Act, to constitute double taxation. The court ordered the refund of unlawfully collected trade tax post a specific date and directed the State to cease levying trade tax on molasses purchases. The Supreme Court stayed the refund of taxes pending appeal, with the State liable to pay interest if the assessee succeeded in the appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222127