<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 315 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222119</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on grounds 1 to 4, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s contentions. However, on ground 5 concerning the treatment of interest receipt as part of the assessee&#039;s income of growing and manufacturing tea, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and allowed the Revenue&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 315 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222119</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on grounds 1 to 4, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s contentions. However, on ground 5 concerning the treatment of interest receipt as part of the assessee&#039;s income of growing and manufacturing tea, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and allowed the Revenue&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>