<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 309 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax 8% of gross receipts net of service tax and allow interest and depreciation thereafter to prevent the income from being less than initially declared. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the correct computation of income to ensure it was not reduced below the initial declaration, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:43:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 309 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax 8% of gross receipts net of service tax and allow interest and depreciation thereafter to prevent the income from being less than initially declared. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the correct computation of income to ensure it was not reduced below the initial declaration, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>