<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 304 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222108</link>
    <description>A disputed no claim certificate did not bar appointment of an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 where an arbitration agreement existed and the court found a prima facie case of financial duress. The court held that questions whether the discharge voucher was voluntary, whether the dispute was live or finally settled by accord and satisfaction, and whether the claim fell within the arbitration clause were matters for the arbitral tribunal. The respondent&#039;s reliance on an alleged excepted matter therefore did not defeat reference to arbitration, and the disputes were referred for decision by the arbitrator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 304 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222108</link>
      <description>A disputed no claim certificate did not bar appointment of an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 where an arbitration agreement existed and the court found a prima facie case of financial duress. The court held that questions whether the discharge voucher was voluntary, whether the dispute was live or finally settled by accord and satisfaction, and whether the claim fell within the arbitration clause were matters for the arbitral tribunal. The respondent&#039;s reliance on an alleged excepted matter therefore did not defeat reference to arbitration, and the disputes were referred for decision by the arbitrator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>