https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222105 The court held that the petitioners were entitled to retain the rebate previously sanctioned and paid, as they were not involved in the fraudulent actions that led to the erroneous payment. The court set aside the orders of the authorities and refrained them from seeking any recovery of the rebate. If any rebate was already recovered, it should be refunded to the petitioners with interest. The petition was disposed of with no costs. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222105 The court held that the petitioners were entitled to retain the rebate previously sanctioned and paid, as they were not involved in the fraudulent actions that led to the erroneous payment. The court set aside the orders of the authorities and refrained them from seeking any recovery of the rebate. If any rebate was already recovered, it should be refunded to the petitioners with interest. The petition was disposed of with no costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222105