https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222104 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the petitioner's appeal regarding excise duty exemption under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. The court found that the petitioner's manufacturing unit at Iyava, Sanand was not recognized by KVIC, failing to meet the exemption conditions. As a result, the petitioner was deemed liable to pay excise duty, with the court ruling no legal error in the Tribunal's decision. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222104 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the petitioner's appeal regarding excise duty exemption under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. The court found that the petitioner's manufacturing unit at Iyava, Sanand was not recognized by KVIC, failing to meet the exemption conditions. As a result, the petitioner was deemed liable to pay excise duty, with the court ruling no legal error in the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222104