<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 296 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision of Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning jurisdictional issues. The appellant&#039;s failure to appeal the initial decision by Asstt. Commissioner, Delhi led to the rejection of subsequent claims by Asstt. Commissioner, Sonepat. The Tribunal held that the latter lacked authority to reconsider the matter, emphasizing the need to challenge decisions at a higher appellate forum. Consequently, the appellant was denied a refund of Service Tax credit, as the rejection was upheld based on jurisdictional grounds. The appeal was dismissed, and the COD application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 296 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision of Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning jurisdictional issues. The appellant&#039;s failure to appeal the initial decision by Asstt. Commissioner, Delhi led to the rejection of subsequent claims by Asstt. Commissioner, Sonepat. The Tribunal held that the latter lacked authority to reconsider the matter, emphasizing the need to challenge decisions at a higher appellate forum. Consequently, the appellant was denied a refund of Service Tax credit, as the rejection was upheld based on jurisdictional grounds. The appeal was dismissed, and the COD application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>