<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 279 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222083</link>
    <description>Appointment of an arbitrator under the contractual procedure, followed by the arbitrator entering reference, leaves no vacancy for a further appointment under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. An application seeking appointment in those circumstances is not maintainable. Objections that the existing appointment was contrary to the contract or otherwise invalid concern the arbitral tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction and must be raised before that tribunal under section 16. The court should not ordinarily examine the validity of the existing appointment in section 11(6) proceedings, leaving jurisdictional objections to the arbitral forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 279 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222083</link>
      <description>Appointment of an arbitrator under the contractual procedure, followed by the arbitrator entering reference, leaves no vacancy for a further appointment under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. An application seeking appointment in those circumstances is not maintainable. Objections that the existing appointment was contrary to the contract or otherwise invalid concern the arbitral tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction and must be raised before that tribunal under section 16. The court should not ordinarily examine the validity of the existing appointment in section 11(6) proceedings, leaving jurisdictional objections to the arbitral forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>