<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 278 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222082</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside and quashed the impugned order, directing the Tribunal to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with the law, preferably within two months. Both appeals by the Department and the petitioner were to be heard and disposed of together. The Court clarified that it did not delve into the merits of the contentions of the parties before the Tribunal. Additionally, urgent certified copies of the order were to be provided to the parties upon application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 278 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222082</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside and quashed the impugned order, directing the Tribunal to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with the law, preferably within two months. Both appeals by the Department and the petitioner were to be heard and disposed of together. The Court clarified that it did not delve into the merits of the contentions of the parties before the Tribunal. Additionally, urgent certified copies of the order were to be provided to the parties upon application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>