https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222079 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an order of the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise directing a refund and imposing a penalty, citing lack of jurisdiction under Article 226 due to an alternative remedy available under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking relief through a writ petition, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the case. en-us Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222079 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an order of the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise directing a refund and imposing a penalty, citing lack of jurisdiction under Article 226 due to an alternative remedy available under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking relief through a writ petition, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222079