<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222070</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the ITAT remitting the issues regarding the addition of Rs. 1,581,163,105/- and Rs. 16,699,360/- back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate its claims. The ITAT emphasized the need for adequate opportunity and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222070</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the ITAT remitting the issues regarding the addition of Rs. 1,581,163,105/- and Rs. 16,699,360/- back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate its claims. The ITAT emphasized the need for adequate opportunity and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>