<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 256 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant interest on a refund of duty from December 1995 onwards until the refund payment date. The decision emphasized the correct interpretation of the payment as duty under Section 28 of the Customs Act, making the appellant eligible for interest under Section 27A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 256 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant interest on a refund of duty from December 1995 onwards until the refund payment date. The decision emphasized the correct interpretation of the payment as duty under Section 28 of the Customs Act, making the appellant eligible for interest under Section 27A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>