https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222049 The tribunal upheld the confirmation of demand for the period from 6-10-2010 to 5-11-2010, with payment required in cash or through PLA. The demand for the period from 28-1-2011 to July 2011 was set aside. Penalties were reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/- under Rule 25 and Rs. 3,00,000/- under Rule 15. The reversal of inadmissible Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 11,55,460/- was upheld. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222049 The tribunal upheld the confirmation of demand for the period from 6-10-2010 to 5-11-2010, with payment required in cash or through PLA. The demand for the period from 28-1-2011 to July 2011 was set aside. Penalties were reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/- under Rule 25 and Rs. 3,00,000/- under Rule 15. The reversal of inadmissible Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 11,55,460/- was upheld. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222049