<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 243 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222047</link>
    <description>The court found no errors apparent on the face of the records warranting rectification under section 6(6) of the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act. It concluded that the orders were illegal but not vitiated by errors, dismissing the writ petition and advising the petitioner to seek remedies against the orders in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 243 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222047</link>
      <description>The court found no errors apparent on the face of the records warranting rectification under section 6(6) of the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act. It concluded that the orders were illegal but not vitiated by errors, dismissing the writ petition and advising the petitioner to seek remedies against the orders in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>