<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 239 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222043</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claims for service tax paid on exported input services were initially rejected on grounds of consideration not received in foreign currency, time-barred claim amount, and alleged improper maintenance of accounts. The Tribunal found the rejection based on non-receipt in foreign currency unwarranted after the appellant provided evidence through a banker&#039;s certificate. The appellant agreed to forego the time-barred claim amount, and the rejection was upheld. The allegation of improper accounts maintenance was dismissed as the appellant&#039;s computerized accounts met legal requirements. The appeal was allowed, except for the contested amount of Rs. 1,05,813, which was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 239 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222043</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claims for service tax paid on exported input services were initially rejected on grounds of consideration not received in foreign currency, time-barred claim amount, and alleged improper maintenance of accounts. The Tribunal found the rejection based on non-receipt in foreign currency unwarranted after the appellant provided evidence through a banker&#039;s certificate. The appellant agreed to forego the time-barred claim amount, and the rejection was upheld. The allegation of improper accounts maintenance was dismissed as the appellant&#039;s computerized accounts met legal requirements. The appeal was allowed, except for the contested amount of Rs. 1,05,813, which was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>