<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 237 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222041</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the confiscation orders due to the lack of mandatory notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, declared the seizure and confiscation illegal, and directed customs authorities to bear the demurrage charges and ground rent incurred by the petitioner. The court also mandated reimbursement with interest at 9% per annum. The petition was disposed of with these directions, and the rule was made absolute accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 237 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222041</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the confiscation orders due to the lack of mandatory notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, declared the seizure and confiscation illegal, and directed customs authorities to bear the demurrage charges and ground rent incurred by the petitioner. The court also mandated reimbursement with interest at 9% per annum. The petition was disposed of with these directions, and the rule was made absolute accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>