https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222040 The High Court held that writ petitions challenging SEBI orders were not maintainable as there was an available appeal process before the Appellate Tribunal with specialized members. Emphasizing the statutory appellate remedy, the Court directed the petitioners to pursue that route rather than seeking redress through writ petitions. Citing relevant case law, the Court highlighted the scrutiny power of High Courts over Tribunal decisions and the exceptions where alternative remedies do not bar the High Court's jurisdiction, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:53:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222040 The High Court held that writ petitions challenging SEBI orders were not maintainable as there was an available appeal process before the Appellate Tribunal with specialized members. Emphasizing the statutory appellate remedy, the Court directed the petitioners to pursue that route rather than seeking redress through writ petitions. Citing relevant case law, the Court highlighted the scrutiny power of High Courts over Tribunal decisions and the exceptions where alternative remedies do not bar the High Court's jurisdiction, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222040