https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222038 The court held that the defendant had not waived its right to seek arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It determined that the disputed matter did not fall within the "excepted matters" clause of the agreement, allowing the plaintiff to challenge decisions made by specified authorities through arbitration. Consequently, the court referred the suit and pending applications to arbitration, emphasizing the enforceability of the arbitration clause in the agreements. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222038 The court held that the defendant had not waived its right to seek arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It determined that the disputed matter did not fall within the "excepted matters" clause of the agreement, allowing the plaintiff to challenge decisions made by specified authorities through arbitration. Consequently, the court referred the suit and pending applications to arbitration, emphasizing the enforceability of the arbitration clause in the agreements. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222038