<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 233 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222037</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the amendments in Rule 28 of the West Bengal Excise (Country Spirit) Rules, 2009, citing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Taxation Tribunal over matters related to tax adjudication and enforcement. The court directed the petitioners to approach the Taxation Tribunal for redressal, emphasizing the importance of seeking remedies through the appropriate legal forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 233 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222037</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the amendments in Rule 28 of the West Bengal Excise (Country Spirit) Rules, 2009, citing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Taxation Tribunal over matters related to tax adjudication and enforcement. The court directed the petitioners to approach the Taxation Tribunal for redressal, emphasizing the importance of seeking remedies through the appropriate legal forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>