<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 230 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 57,50,000/- as undisclosed income was unjustified due to lack of corroborative evidence, denial of cross-examination, and the risk of double taxation. The addition was deleted, partially allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The challenge to the reopening of assessment was dismissed, while the objection to the addition of undisclosed income was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 230 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 57,50,000/- as undisclosed income was unjustified due to lack of corroborative evidence, denial of cross-examination, and the risk of double taxation. The addition was deleted, partially allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The challenge to the reopening of assessment was dismissed, while the objection to the addition of undisclosed income was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>