<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 228 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both the assessee and the Revenue. Various issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with earlier judgments and directions. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on precedents set in the assessee&#039;s own case for earlier years and relevant judicial pronouncements, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 228 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both the assessee and the Revenue. Various issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with earlier judgments and directions. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on precedents set in the assessee&#039;s own case for earlier years and relevant judicial pronouncements, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>