<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 227 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, confirming the addition of Rs.8,94,405 as unexplained investment in purchase and sale. The CIT(A) corrected the A.O.&#039;s computation errors, allowing a relief of Rs.22,74,495 and directing the A.O. to consider the total income at Rs.2,22,934. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, finding no issues with the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 227 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, confirming the addition of Rs.8,94,405 as unexplained investment in purchase and sale. The CIT(A) corrected the A.O.&#039;s computation errors, allowing a relief of Rs.22,74,495 and directing the A.O. to consider the total income at Rs.2,22,934. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, finding no issues with the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>