<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 222 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to allow the provision for leave encashment based on actuarial valuation, following the principles from the Metal Box Company case. The order passed by the ld. CIT(A) was deemed justifiable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 222 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to allow the provision for leave encashment based on actuarial valuation, following the principles from the Metal Box Company case. The order passed by the ld. CIT(A) was deemed justifiable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>