<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the confiscation of excess goods with reduced fines and penalties, and restoring the duty demand and penalty for goods found short. The decision reinforced the applicability of Rule 25 and Section 11AC in cases of unaccounted goods, emphasizing the statutory requirements for maintaining proper records and the consequences of non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the confiscation of excess goods with reduced fines and penalties, and restoring the duty demand and penalty for goods found short. The decision reinforced the applicability of Rule 25 and Section 11AC in cases of unaccounted goods, emphasizing the statutory requirements for maintaining proper records and the consequences of non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>