<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 214 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222018</link>
    <description>The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the constitutional validity of the service tax levy and directed the bank to pay the deposited amount, equivalent to the service tax payable, to the tax authority within four weeks. The petitioner, who leased premises and had already remitted the service tax amount, was found liable for the payment. The court instructed the bank to ensure prompt compliance with the directive for payment from the deposited amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 214 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222018</link>
      <description>The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the constitutional validity of the service tax levy and directed the bank to pay the deposited amount, equivalent to the service tax payable, to the tax authority within four weeks. The petitioner, who leased premises and had already remitted the service tax amount, was found liable for the payment. The court instructed the bank to ensure prompt compliance with the directive for payment from the deposited amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>