<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 212 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222016</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was nullified as the addition in the respondent&#039;s income, which led to the penalty imposition, was reversed by the Tribunal. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, emphasizing the requirement for a valid basis for penalty enforcement when the underlying addition is invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:02:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 212 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222016</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was nullified as the addition in the respondent&#039;s income, which led to the penalty imposition, was reversed by the Tribunal. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, emphasizing the requirement for a valid basis for penalty enforcement when the underlying addition is invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>