<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 210 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A) in favor of the assessee, allowing the higher rate of depreciation at 30% for security vans used in their transportation business. The decision was based on established facts regarding the nature of the assessee&#039;s business activities and supported by relevant judicial precedents. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing consistency in applying depreciation rates for assets used in specific business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 210 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A) in favor of the assessee, allowing the higher rate of depreciation at 30% for security vans used in their transportation business. The decision was based on established facts regarding the nature of the assessee&#039;s business activities and supported by relevant judicial precedents. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing consistency in applying depreciation rates for assets used in specific business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>