<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 208 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222012</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against a penalty for export fraud, where the Tribunal had partially waived the penalty and allowed a reduced deposit. The appellant&#039;s challenge based on a lack of cross-examination opportunity was rejected. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the exclusion of time spent on a writ petition from the limitation period for filing the appeal but denied the request to exclude a previously deposited amount from the pre-deposit. No substantial question of law was found, emphasizing procedural fairness and the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in customs penalty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:01:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 208 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222012</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against a penalty for export fraud, where the Tribunal had partially waived the penalty and allowed a reduced deposit. The appellant&#039;s challenge based on a lack of cross-examination opportunity was rejected. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the exclusion of time spent on a writ petition from the limitation period for filing the appeal but denied the request to exclude a previously deposited amount from the pre-deposit. No substantial question of law was found, emphasizing procedural fairness and the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in customs penalty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>