https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222011 The court quashed the order directing the petitioner to change its name under the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing that the Central Government has discretion in such matters. The court highlighted that the order should consider all relevant facts and afford parties an opportunity to be heard before making a decision on name rectification. The incorrect statement made during registration was noted but not the basis for the order. The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, directing the Registrar of Companies to issue a fresh order after thorough consideration of the circumstances. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222011 The court quashed the order directing the petitioner to change its name under the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing that the Central Government has discretion in such matters. The court highlighted that the order should consider all relevant facts and afford parties an opportunity to be heard before making a decision on name rectification. The incorrect statement made during registration was noted but not the basis for the order. The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, directing the Registrar of Companies to issue a fresh order after thorough consideration of the circumstances. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222011