https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222006 The court addressed the delay in appeal consideration due to the non-constitution of the CESTAT Bench, directing the respondent not to recover arrears of service tax until CESTAT's orders on the stay application. It highlighted the need for additional CESTAT Benches in southern states to expedite appeal disposal, issuing a writ of mandamus to the Union of India to establish multiple Benches promptly. The judgment emphasized the petitioner's lack of responsibility for the delay and required the Union to file a compliance report with the High Court's Registrar General by a specified date. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222006 The court addressed the delay in appeal consideration due to the non-constitution of the CESTAT Bench, directing the respondent not to recover arrears of service tax until CESTAT's orders on the stay application. It highlighted the need for additional CESTAT Benches in southern states to expedite appeal disposal, issuing a writ of mandamus to the Union of India to establish multiple Benches promptly. The judgment emphasized the petitioner's lack of responsibility for the delay and required the Union to file a compliance report with the High Court's Registrar General by a specified date. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=222006