<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 190 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221994</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that the assessment of income for a re-constituted partnership firm had to be done for the entire previous year, regardless of the re-constitution date. The court held that the re-constitution of the firm mandated assessment for the full previous year, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to base the assessment on the returns filed by the assessee. The court considered previous judgments but found a subsequent judgment to be more applicable, ultimately ruling against the assessee and in favor of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 190 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221994</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that the assessment of income for a re-constituted partnership firm had to be done for the entire previous year, regardless of the re-constitution date. The court held that the re-constitution of the firm mandated assessment for the full previous year, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to base the assessment on the returns filed by the assessee. The court considered previous judgments but found a subsequent judgment to be more applicable, ultimately ruling against the assessee and in favor of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>