https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221990 Cheque dishonour liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained where evidence showed business dealings between the parties, issuance of cheques towards an existing liability, dishonour for insufficiency of funds or arrangement, and no reply to the statutory notice. The defence that the cheques were misused or stolen was rejected because it was not supported by convincing material, and no prompt stop-payment or similar action was shown. The trial court and appellate court findings were supported by the evidence, so no revisional interference was warranted and the conviction under Section 138 was upheld. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:33:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221990 Cheque dishonour liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained where evidence showed business dealings between the parties, issuance of cheques towards an existing liability, dishonour for insufficiency of funds or arrangement, and no reply to the statutory notice. The defence that the cheques were misused or stolen was rejected because it was not supported by convincing material, and no prompt stop-payment or similar action was shown. The trial court and appellate court findings were supported by the evidence, so no revisional interference was warranted and the conviction under Section 138 was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221990