<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 183 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of a Final Order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, stating there was no error apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal found the rectification request to be an abuse of process of law and potentially moved with mala fide intention to delay proceedings. The appellant was directed to deposit a cost of Rs. 1 Lakh within a month.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 183 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of a Final Order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, stating there was no error apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal found the rectification request to be an abuse of process of law and potentially moved with mala fide intention to delay proceedings. The appellant was directed to deposit a cost of Rs. 1 Lakh within a month.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>