<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 182 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow exemption for education cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E., ruling that these cesses were not covered by the exemption based on the specific wording of the notification and previous court judgments. The Tribunal referenced the Apex Court&#039;s decision and other legal interpretations to support its conclusion, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 182 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow exemption for education cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E., ruling that these cesses were not covered by the exemption based on the specific wording of the notification and previous court judgments. The Tribunal referenced the Apex Court&#039;s decision and other legal interpretations to support its conclusion, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>