https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221985 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the burden of proof regarding passing on duty to customers shifted to the department once the respondent demonstrated bearing the duty. As the department failed to provide evidence contradicting the respondent's claim, the refund claims were upheld, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221985 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the burden of proof regarding passing on duty to customers shifted to the department once the respondent demonstrated bearing the duty. As the department failed to provide evidence contradicting the respondent's claim, the refund claims were upheld, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221985