https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221984 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for payment equal to 10% of the sale value of bagasse due to the impracticality of maintaining separate accounts for inputs used in the production process. The Tribunal found that the amendment in the Finance Act and the Board Circular did not change the circumstances of the case and noted the lack of specific details in the impugned order regarding the use of common Cenvat credit availed inputs. The appeal and stay applications were allowed. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221984 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for payment equal to 10% of the sale value of bagasse due to the impracticality of maintaining separate accounts for inputs used in the production process. The Tribunal found that the amendment in the Finance Act and the Board Circular did not change the circumstances of the case and noted the lack of specific details in the impugned order regarding the use of common Cenvat credit availed inputs. The appeal and stay applications were allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221984